Understandable e.g. for those who have to take quick decisions. Not seldomly forced by a group of shareholders who would like to see revenue on investment. This is what you see in different form during human history. Humans are scared to lose.
The underlying point of the post is that if people are busy looking only where the looking is easy, because of fear and anxiety, etc., their assessment of the risk/chances of various alternatives will be intrinsically biased and self-limiting. This also means that having this bias for easy looking also reflects negatively on the quality of the thought process involved. Lose-lose.
Understandable e.g. for those who have to take quick decisions. Not seldomly forced by a group of shareholders who would like to see revenue on investment. This is what you see in different form during human history. Humans are scared to lose.
And therefore oftentimes lose anyway...
This depends on the quality of fhe thought proces before starting something innovative. A combination of ratio and taking chances, I assume humbly.
The underlying point of the post is that if people are busy looking only where the looking is easy, because of fear and anxiety, etc., their assessment of the risk/chances of various alternatives will be intrinsically biased and self-limiting. This also means that having this bias for easy looking also reflects negatively on the quality of the thought process involved. Lose-lose.
Affirmed. Thank you for sending.